I’ve always believed that nothing inspires a curious neophyte more than engaging with a primary text. You really feel like you’re coming to grips with the past. Of course, you need some aids in interpreting it, but it’s still better than relying entirely on someone else’s interpretation.
For a 101 course, I might suggest something like this:
Jerry Thomas 1876
William Schmidt, 1891
Hugo Ensslin, 1917
Robert Vermiere, 1922
Harry Craddock, 1930
Floridita, 1939
Charles Baker, 1946
David Embury, 1948
I’m sure I’m missing something important, but it’s a start.